About us | About Scoope | Contact us

 Sponsor Links
| Articles | White Papers | Presentations 

Articles                                                                                                  TOP

eBooks: Will Technology Kill Book Publishing?

(huffingtonpost.com): There has been much talk about the decline, and some say inevitable death, of the publishing industry as we know it today. Central to this argument are the rise of e-book sales and the increasing options available to authors to self-publish.
Click here

Drug firms 'must publish all data'

(google.com): Drug companies should be forced to publish all their trial data rather than selecting evidence to back up their claims, experts have said. A review of clinical trial results for the anti-depressant Edronax (reboxetine) showed pharmaceutical firms did not publish most of the data for the drug.
Click here

Ebook popularity has publishers fearing 'Napster moment'

(thespec.com): Scores of readers have embraced devices like Kindles and iPads, but their new-found popularity has also brought about concerns that e-books are having a "Napster moment." Google searches for illegal downloads are up 50 per cent in the last year. Publishers hope to appeal to readers to make the right choice.
Click here

Scientific misconduct and skepticgate

(sciblogs.co.nz): Plagiarism is the use of text from others' writing without attribution. This was a big issue for student assessment at universities but apparently it is also an issue for scientific journals. Many journals now use a computer programme to check out submitted papers for plagiarized content..
Click here

Long Road to Open Access

(insidehighered.com): It has been more than a year since five leading research universities agreed to establish "timely" mechanisms for paying the publication fees for faculty who decide to publish in open-access journals. The goal is to eventually lure journals away from a subscriber-based model that limits access to articles and costs libraries a fortune. Open-access journals eliminate the steep prices of print, but their growth has been limited by the absence of a revenue stream to support the costs associated with peer review. The idea that top universities might help subsidize these costs was seen by some as a key step toward creating a revenue stream to replace subscriber fees.
Click here

For banner ads click here