About us | About Scoope | Contact us

 Sponsor Links
| Articles | White Papers | Presentations 

Articles                                                                                                  TOP

Journal hijackers target science and open access

Academic researchers need to publish the results of their research in scientific journals to be able to graduate or to advance their careers. The first systematic misconduct and deviation from the generally-accepted good practices for publishing scientific journals began in the early 2000s when some commercial journals began to misuse the open-access movement by publishing unreviewed manuscripts in a 'pay and get published' model. Following this, around two years ago, a new line of misconduct in scientific publishing emerged in the world of academic publishing: hijacked journals. In this phenomenon, cyber criminals create counterfeit websites for legitimate journals, broadcast call-for-paper spams, and attack the reputation and scientific life of the researchers by publishing their unreviewed articles on fake journal websites and stealing their money.
Click here

The Digital Evolution in Academic Publishing

Being in educational technology for the past 18 years, the author has observed the evolution firsthand. The industry went from a slow tech uptake to unusually rapid, often reactionary solutions. However, as the dust has settled, many of the most influential educational publishers, such as Pearson, McGraw Hill and Wiley, have taken strategic steps towards change. Much like the music industry, it is an 'adapt or die' environment. In the higher education sector, the use of technology has risen from 20 percent in 2010 to 40 percent in 2014. While this data is not necessarily pure (most students who 'go digital' are upper-class college students), the number itself is undeniable.
Click here

Growing Usage at Academic Institutions

The development of online journals and books has now made it possible for librarians and publishers to gather information on how often a piece of content is used at an academic institution. For publishers, this can be an important tool in editorial development. For libraries, it is often factored in to their decision to renew or add to a subscription. Publishers must count on librarians to inform their users about the availability of the resource, but there are things a publisher can do to support this process.
Click here

Can you trust open-access journals?

Open-access journals have proliferated in recent years. As opposed to 'traditional' publications that charge readers (often institutions) a hefty fee to access journal content, open-access journals provide their content for free on the web, and typically charge writers to publish their work. Open-access journals are a good thing because they make scientific information available to audiences beyond academics with library subscriptions. Problems arise, however, when the financial incentive for open-access journals to accept articles results in the publication of poor quality research that hasn't undergone rigorous peer-review.
Click here

Why Journal Impact Factor is hurting science

In order to improve something, we need to be able to measure its quality. This is true in public policy, in commercial industries, and also in science. Like other fields, science has a growing need for quantitative evaluation of its products: scientific studies. However, the dominant metric used for this purpose is widely considered to be flawed. It is the journal impact factor.
Click here

For banner ads click here