(nextgov.com): The American Psychological Association, which publishes scientific articles, believes the future of scientific publishing is among the "genuinely compelling interests," Steven Breckler, executive director for science at the association, testified before the House Government Reform and Oversight Subcommittee on Information Policy, Census and National Archives. The panel invited publishers, scientists, Internet users who have benefited from online research and a federal official to examine the possibility of increasing free online access to scholarly journal articles derived from federally funded research. Breckler said the potential ramifications of open access policies, including one recently established at the National Institutes of Health, include reducing the number of peer reviewed journals, a publishing model where the author must pay to be published, and commercial repackaging of content that otherwise would be protected by copyright.
(metrowestdailynews.com): While you might expect a spike in e-book sales to be bad for local bookstores, readers and retailers say there's room for digital and traditional volumes to coexist. While the popularity of e-books is on the rise, the Wellesley Booksmith and Framingham Barnes&Noble say sales of their paper books have been solid.
(reason.com): The inaugural Open Science Summit kicked off Thursday afternoon at the University of California, Berkeley's International House. Some 200 participants have gathered to "update the social contract for science." The summit's chief organizer, a young intellectual entrepreneur named Joseph P. Jackson III, says his aim is to jumpstart Enlightenment 2.0. However, the first panel of presenters made it clear that Enlightenment 1.0 is mired in a bureaucracy run by careerist professionals.
(timeshighereducation.co.uk): It is almost "criminally irresponsible" to hoard academic knowledge in the digital age, according to a Canadian specialist in the field. Brian Lamb, manager of emerging technologies and digital content at the University of British Columbia, also said that open educational resources (OERs) could help to reassert the academy's role as a "leader and guardian of free and open enquiry". He made the comments at the Open Educational Resources International Symposium in London, which was sponsored by the Joint Information Systems Committee.
(scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org): A premise of the Internet publishing revolutionaries has been that because distribution is ubiquitous, the marginal cost of content approaches zero, meaning that information should become much cheaper than it once was. In fact, it should be free once a modicum of cost is paid for - hence, the open access model, for instance, or the devalued online access prices for institutional access, for another instance.