About us | About Scoope | Contact us

 Sponsor Links
| Articles | White Papers | Presentations 

Articles                                                                                                  TOP

Publishers bet future on iPad they haven't yet seen

(reuters.com): Publishers are placing big bets that Apple Inc's iPad will kick-start a commercially viable transition to digital magazines and newspapers -- even though few executives have laid hands on the tablet ahead of launch. In fact, many publishers likely will not announce their iPad applications until after the tablet hits U.S. stores on Saturday, due to the many constraints that Apple has placed on allowing its partners access to the device.
Click here

Designing the Optimal Open Access Mandate

(openaccess.eprints.org): As the number of Open Access (OA) mandates adopted by universities worldwide grows it is important to ensure that the most effective mandate model is selected for adoption, and that a very clear distinction is made between what is required and what is recommended. By far the most effective and widely applicable OA policy is to require that the author's final, revised peer-reviewed draft must be deposited in the institutional repository (IR) immediately upon acceptance for publication, without exception, but only to recommend, not require, that access to the deposit should be set immediately as Open Access (at least 63% of journals already endorse immediate, unembargoed OA).
Click here

Bias in scientific publishing rife

(lifescientist.com.au): The reluctance for negative or neutral results to be published in scientific or medical journals continues to bias research and encourage the proliferation of false medical truths, found an international team of researchers. The negative results conundrum has plagued scientific publication for many years as journals tend to be more inclined to publish significant or positive results rather than the results of a study that has found no significant effect. Acknowledgement of this phenomenon resulted in the creation of a series of journals of 'negative results', although they are still significantly outnumbered by journals of 'positive results'.
Click here

Online. Indexed. Catalogued. Free. But will users find it?

(ingentaconnect.com): 'If it isn't online, it doesn't exist' seems to be the accepted wisdom in scholarly publishing today. Access to content can be complex and difficult; even making it free does not ensure that users discover it, since free content may not be represented in library tools. Most publishers make some effort to address this: engaging with the ready-made audiences of hosting services, full-text aggregators and subscription agent gateways; distributing metadata to subject-specific indexing databases; allowing search engines and document delivery providers to index full-text content; sharing holdings information with libraries and developers of eresource management tools.
Click here

In E-Book Era, You Can't Even Judge a Cover

(nytimes.com): With a growing number of people turning to Kindles and other electronic readers, and with the Apple iPad arriving on Saturday, it is not always possible to see what others are reading or to project your own literary tastes. You can't tell a book by its cover if it doesn't have one. Among other changes heralded by the e-book era, digital editions are bumping book covers off the subway, the coffee table and the beach. That is a loss for publishers and authors, who enjoy some free advertising for their books in printed form.
Click here

For banner ads click here